Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

Guidelines

A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part III. preparation of enteral nutrition formulas: In Seok Lee, Ye Rim Chang, Bo-Eun Kim, Youn Soo Cho, Sung-Sik Han, Eunjung Kim, Hyunjung Kim, Jae Hak Kim, Jeong Wook Kim, Sung Shin Kim, Eunhee Kong, Ja Kyung Min, Chi-Min Park, Jeongyun Park, Seungwan Ryu, Kyung Won Seo, Jung Mi Song, Minji Seok, Eun-Mi Seol, Jinhee Yoon, Jeong-Meen Seo, for the KSPEN Enteral Nutrition Committee; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2026;18(1):3-9. Published online March 30, 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.26.0046

Abstract PDF: Purpose
This guideline was developed to provide evidence-based recommendations for the safe preparation and handling of enteral nutrition (EN) formulas in order to improve patient safety and promote standardized clinical practice in Korea.
Methods
The key questions addressed the selection of open versus closed feeding systems, the safe preparation and handling of EN formulas, precautions related to blenderized tube feeding (BTF), and essential labeling requirements. Recommendations were drafted and refined through multidisciplinary expert consensus under the auspices of the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN).
Results
The choice of feeding system should be determined according to the patient’s condition, risk of infection, and anticipated duration of feeding. Closed feeding systems are recommended because they reduce contamination risk and nursing workload, whereas open feeding systems require strict adherence to aseptic technique. For open or reconstituted EN formulas, hang time at room temperature should not exceed 4 hours, whereas closed feeding systems should follow the manufacturer’s recommended hang time. For BTF, administration time should be limited to 2 hours to minimize bacterial growth, and their use is contraindicated in medically unstable or immunocompromised patients. Accurate labeling, including patient identifiers, formula information, administration route, and hang time, is essential to prevent administration errors.
Conclusion
These guidelines provide a practical framework for the safe preparation and management of EN formulas. Adherence to standardized preparation protocols, including appropriate feeding system selection and strict hygiene practices, is essential for reducing complications and improving the safety of EN therapy.

675 View
31 Download

A practical guide for enteral nutrition from the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Part II. selection and initiation of enteral feeding routes: Ja Kyung Min, Ye Rim Chang, Bo-Eun Kim, In Seok Lee, Jung Mi Song, Hyunjung Kim, Jae Hak Kim, Kyung Won Seo, Sung Shin Kim, Chi-Min Park, Jeongyun Park, Eunjung Kim, Eunmi Sul, Sung-Sik Han, Jeong Wook Kim, Seungwan Ryu, Minji Seok, Jinhee Yoon, Eunhee Kong, Youn Soo Cho, Jeong Meen Seo, for KSPEN Enteral Nutrition Committee; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(3):165-171. Published online December 1, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0037

Abstract PDF: Purpose
We developed evidence-based recommendations for selecting and initiating the enteral nutrition (EN) delivery route in adult and pediatric patients to improve safety and standardize practice in Korea.
Methods
Key questions covered feeding tube selection, methods to verify tube placement, confirmation in pediatric patients, and timing of EN following percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). Recommendations were drafted and refined through multidisciplinary expert consensus under the Korean Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (KSPEN).
Results
Feeding tube selection should be based on gastrointestinal anatomy, function, and expected EN duration. Short-term feeding is recommended with nasogastric or orogastric tubes, whereas long-term feeding should use percutaneous or surgical routes such as PEG. Tube position must always be verified before use, preferably with radiography or pH testing; auscultation alone is unreliable and should not be used. In pediatric patients, radiographic confirmation remains the gold standard, although pH testing and insertion-length assessment may be considered when imaging is not feasible. After PEG, EN can be initiated safely within 4 hours in both adults and children without increasing complications if trained staff monitor for leakage or infection.
Conclusion
This guideline offers a structured framework for safe and timely EN tailored to patient characteristics. Early verification and multidisciplinary collaboration help reduce complication, improving outcomes of EN therapy.

1,547 View
81 Download

Original Article

Development of a pre- and re-habilitation protocol for gastrointestinal cancer surgery: Eun Young Kim, Jung Hoon Bae, Jiseon Kim, Eun Joo Yang, Sang-Jae Park, In Kyu Lee, on behalf of the Task Force Team for Development and Trial Application of Pre/Rehabilitation Protocol in GI Cancer Surgery; Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(1):25-40. Published online April 1, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0001

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
Surgical resection is the primary curative treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer; however, it is associated with high postoperative complication rates and impaired recovery. Frailty, malnutrition, and sarcopenia increase morbidity and mortality, underscoring the need for perioperative rehabilitation programs. Standardized rehabilitation protocols during the perioperative period are currently lacking in Korea. We aimed to develop an evidence-based rehabilitation protocol for GI cancer patients to enhance postoperative outcomes and facilitate clinical implementation.
Methods
A multidisciplinary task force team comprising experts in surgery, clinical nutrition, and rehabilitation medicine conducted a systematic literature search and comprehensive review from 2012 to 2022 to develop a standardized pre- and re-habilitation protocol for GI cancer surgery. The protocol underwent external validation and subsequent refinements before being finalized through expert consensus.
Results
The protocol development process was organized into four consecutive phases: keyword selection, literature review and case report form development, initial protocol drafting, and external validation leading to the final version of the protocol. The final version of the rehabilitation protocol is presented in the main text and included as Supplements.
Conclusion
This protocol provides a standardized clinical guideline based on the latest evidence-based pre- and re-habilitation strategies and is designed for seamless integration into routine clinical practice. By facilitating proactive rehabilitation interventions, it aims to improve outcomes in GI cancer patients who are at high risk of postoperative complications, functional decline, and malnutrition.

4,196 View
129 Download

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search