Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism

Indexed in:
Scopus, KCI, KoreaMed
OPEN ACCESS

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Treatment outcome"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Impact of tube feeding after pancreaticoduodenectomy on nutritional intake and status: a retrospective cohort study in Japan
Masaharu Ishida, Masahiro Iseki, Shuichiro Hayashi, Aya Noguchi, Hideaki Sato, Shingo Yoshimachi, Akiko Kusaka, Mitsuhiro Shimura, Shuichi Aoki, Daisuke Douchi, Takayuki Miura, Shimpei Maeda, Masamichi Mizuma, Kei Nakagawa, Takashi Kamei, Michiaki Unno
Ann Clin Nutr Metab 2025;17(3):203-209.   Published online December 1, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/ACNM.25.0020
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is one of the most invasive procedures in gastrointestinal surgery. However, the clinical significance of postoperative tube feeding remains unclear. This study investigated the impact of enteral nutrition (EN) on the postoperative nutritional status of patients undergoing PD.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 129 patients who underwent PD at Tohoku University Hospital. Nutritional intake and status, evaluated using the Controlling Nutritional Status score, were compared between two groups: an EN group (97 patients) and a non-EN group (32 patients).
Results
There were no significant differences between the two groups in age, sex, body mass index, underlying diseases, operative duration, blood loss, postoperative pancreatic fistula, postoperative complications, delayed gastric emptying, or length of hospital stay. Although the EN group showed improvements in nutritional status both at discharge and compared with preoperative values, none of these changes reached statistical significance. Oral caloric intake was significantly higher in the non-EN group (P=0.01). In contrast, total energy intake was higher in the EN group, but this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07).
Conclusion
Tube feeding after PD did not significantly influence postoperative nutritional status or overall nutritional intake. These findings suggest that EN offers no clear advantage over other approaches; however, further research is warranted to validate these results, refine existing guidelines, and optimize postoperative patient management.
  • 145 View
  • 8 Download
Close layer
Characteristics and Clinical Course of Patients Who Received Enteral or Parenteral Nutrition in Tertiary Referral Hospitals in Korea
Eunmi Seol, Yun-Suhk Suh, Dal Lae Ju, Hye Jung Bae, Hyuk-Joon Lee
J Clin Nutr 2016;8(2):58-65.   Published online August 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15747/jcn.2016.8.2.58
AbstractAbstract PDF

Purpose:

The purposes of this study are to evaluate clinical characteristics of malnourished patients who received nutritional therapy and to compare their clinical courses according to nutritional support team (NST) consultation in tertiary referral hospital in Korea.

Methods:

From June 2014 to May 2015, 43,954 admitted patients who were more than 18 years old were retrospectively investigated. Characteristics of patients who received enteral nutrition (EN) or parenteral nutrition (PN) for more than 3 days (nutritional therapy group) were compared to the patients without nutritional therapy (control group). In addition, clinical courses according to NST consultation (NST group and non-NST group) were compared through propensity score matching (PSM).

Results:

EN or PN was applied in 4,599 patients for more than 3 days (nutritional therapy group: 10.5%). For characteristics, there were significant differences between two groups (nutritional therapy group vs. control group) with age, male proportion, body weight, body mass index. All laboratory data at admission were significantly worse in nutritional therapy group. And for clinical courses, there were significant differences in length of stay (LOS), rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, LOS in ICU, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Enquiry (APACHE II) score, days of nutritional therapy, mortality rate. NST consultation was made in 39% of nutritional therapy group. Among departments, Thoracic Surgery showed the highest rate of NST consultation (68.5%) otherwise Neurosurgery showed the lowest rate (18.7%). When PSM between NST group vs. non-NST group were made, significant differences was shown only in the rate of ICU admission, EN or PN support days, cholesterol at discharge.

Conclusion:

In tertiary referral hospital in Korea, more than 10% of patients still needed active nutritional therapy. NST consultation rate varies among departments. We failed to find significant differences between NST group and non-NST group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Early nutritional support for inpatients reduces admission rates to intensive care units in Korea: a single-center case-control study
    Hyun Suk Kim, Jae Do Yang, Se Wung Han, Mi Rin Lee, Da-Sol Kim, Sejin Lee, Seon-Hyeong Kim, Chan-Young Kim
    Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism.2024; 16(2): 57.     CrossRef
  • Report on the Current Trend of Commercial Enteral/Parenteral Nutrition in Outpatient
    Hyun Ji Lee, Hyo Jung Park, Seon Young Chung, Myung Sook Min, Ok Soon Jeong, Ja Kyung Min
    Journal of Korean Society of Health-System Pharmacists.2023; 40(2): 211.     CrossRef
  • Nutritional Status of Intensive Care Unit Patients According to the Referral to the Nutrition Support Team and Compliance with the Recommendations
    Yunjin Sohn, Taisun Hyun
    Korean Journal of Community Nutrition.2022; 27(2): 121.     CrossRef
  • Physician Compliance with Nutrition Support Team Recommendations: Effects on the Outcome of Treatment for Critically Ill Patients
    Hyon-Ju Yon, Eun-Suk Oh, Ji Young Jang, Ji Yun Jang, Hongjin Shim
    Journal of Acute Care Surgery.2022; 12(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Path Analysis for Delirium on Patient Prognosis in Intensive Care Units
    Sunhee Lee, Sun-Mi Lee
    Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing.2019; 49(6): 724.     CrossRef
  • 1,044 View
  • 4 Download
  • 5 Crossref
Close layer

Ann Clin Nutr Metab : Annals of Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism
Close layer
TOP